Knight Templar wrote:
Knight Templar wrote:
And just for the record: I posted this thread in the men's forum because it was supposed to be about how men talk to each other while drinking a beer or shooting pool. That was what the thread was about and who it was aimed at. What's wrong. You don't want people to know the truth? That the thread was about MEN shooting pool, having a beer, and about how MEN talk to each other? About how you got mad at a PM I sent you and decided to change the venue, change the wording, change the audience, change the poll, put words in my mouth I never said, all because you got upset? You find the truth offensive? Keep editing the truth out. They may not know what you are doing, but I do.
Edited to remove rude comments directed at me (and by the way, I am still not a man)
This entire thread has nothing at all to do with what I originally posted!!!
You people want to talk about "unethical"? That must be THEE MOST unethical thing I have ever seen a mod do.
Um, you posted in the Wine Cellar, which is NOT the men's forum......The Wine Cellar
Fellowship for us old guys...40+.I don't know what "old guys" means to you, but it sure looks like men to me.
You have misunderstood. "Old guys" means everyone over 40. If it was men only it would be a subforum of the League of Gentlemen, which is in fact the men's forum. No one else has been confused by that in the years we have had that forum, but just to be sure there are no further misunderstandings, I'll change the description to the gender inclusive phrase "guys and gals."
Given, now, that where you posted it was not where you thought you posted it, perhaps you should consider that you did not limit the scope of your post to your intended audience, but in fact to all "old guys and gals." I brought it here because it seemed you would get a more appropriate response here, in the pub. Threads get relocated from one forum to another all the time. (ETA: And since both forums are PUBLIC forums, open to all registered users, there was no exposing anything that wasn't already viewable to all.)
The PM I received from you did nothing except make sure that I was full aware of the context of your question, that I was very clear that you thought that it was "thin-skinned" to object to the misuse of Our Lord's name, and that you thought I had mistreated you because of my own "thin-skin." Your not-so-subtle reference to that made it clear what you really wanted to know with your poll.
Again, I did not put words in your mouth. The fact that I typed in red made it clear I had edited your post as an Admin.
The bottom line here, it seems, is that you are not liking the answer you are getting and so you want to pitch a big enough fit to get the thread locked.
What's actually going to happen is if you continue in this vein, you'll be put on post moderation.