Women "Priests" at Mass Today

Cubano · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:31 pm

faithfulservant wrote:

that was states , not counties according to the anointed one :fyi:

I read once that the Jesuit's plotted with the South during the Civil War and if the South had won, then each state would have become a country. ( I really DID read that)

Bombadil · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:46 pm

Each state would have remained a separate country, loosely confederated under a central authority.

mea · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:27 pm

The South will rise again. :fyi:

Bombadil · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:32 pm

I meant to emphasize the REMAINED part of that.

Highlander · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:52 pm

Bombadil wrote:

Each state would have remained a separate country, loosely confederated under a central authority.

Not exactly -- more like the Articles of Confederation.

Highlander · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:52 pm

Bombadil wrote:

I meant to emphasize the REMAINED part of that.

Which is why the erring Sisters needed to be returned to their rightful role.

Highlander · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:53 pm

mea wrote:

The South will rise again. :fyi:

With similar results. But, back to womyn priestesses.

HalJordan · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:09 pm

Cubano wrote:

faithfulservant wrote:

that was states , not counties according to the anointed one :fyi:

I read once that the Jesuit's plotted with the South during the Civil War and if the South had won, then each state would have become a country. ( I really DID read that)

Ah. CHarles Chiniquy, I believe.

faithfulservant · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:26 pm

mea wrote:

The South will rise again. :fyi:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL-1T9g5-vU

Bombadil · **Posted:** Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:06 pm

faithfulservant wrote:

mea wrote:

The South will rise again. :fyi:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL-1T9g5-vU

That was nice and all, but totally ignored Texas getting a new governor now that Perry bombed his presidential run and our subsequent secession. :fyi:

Cubano · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:49 am

HalJordan wrote:

Cubano wrote:

faithfulservant wrote:

that was states , not counties according to the anointed one :fyi:

I read once that the Jesuit's plotted with the South during the Civil War and if the South had won, then each state would have become a country. ( I really DID read that)

Ah. CHarles Chiniquy, I believe.

might have been our good buddy Jack Chick (say a prayer or Rosary for him will ya'....)

mea · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:36 am

faithfulservant wrote:

mea wrote:

The South will rise again. :fyi:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL-1T9g5-vU

Too bad so many people think that this guy represents Southerners in general (which is not to say that many Southerners don't agree with those sentiments...)

INsearch · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:53 am

Has it been decided that you are going to try and snag some evidence?

MySweetLord · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:46 pm

INsearch wrote:

Has it been decided that you are going to try and snag some evidence?

Well, unless someone has a better idea, I was assuming that a video tape would be good. Also, it would have to be surreptitious. That means hidden camcorder in a button, or a hat, glasses, etc. I'm also trying to work out the possibility of getting a "partner in crime." I don't want to lie to my friend, and tell her that I want to go again. I don't want her to know that I intend to do this. Cowardly? Maybe so.

INsearch · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:48 pm

MySweetLord wrote:

INsearch wrote:

Has it been decided that you are going to try and snag some evidence?

Well, unless someone has a better idea, I was assuming that a video tape would be good. Also, it would have to be surreptitious. That means hidden camcorder in a button, or a hat, glasses, etc. I'm also trying to work out the possibility of getting a "partner in crime." I don't want to lie to my friend, and tell her that I want to go again. I don't want her to know that I intend to do this. Cowardly? Maybe so.

Well they must have other Masses that your friend doesn't attend ay?

MySweetLord · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:16 pm

INsearch wrote:

MySweetLord wrote:

INsearch wrote:

Has it been decided that you are going to try and snag some evidence?

Well, unless someone has a better idea, I was assuming that a video tape would be good. Also, it would have to be surreptitious. That means hidden camcorder in a button, or a hat, glasses, etc. I'm also trying to work out the possibility of getting a "partner in crime." I don't want to lie to my friend, and tell her that I want to go again. I don't want her to know that I intend to do this. Cowardly? Maybe so.

Well they must have other Masses that your friend doesn't attend ay?

I didn't bother to ask her if all Masses are the same, or if some are "charismatic" and some are traditional. I'd better check.

MySweetLord · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:21 pm

Checked their website. One "traditional" at 8:00, and the "Gospel" Mas (which I experienced) at 10:00.

MySweetLord · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:28 pm

I found this:

http://cul.detmich.com/girouxoped.html

sunmumy · **Posted:** Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:24 pm

jaw ..... floor.....

Brendan · **Posted:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:29 pm

MySweetLord wrote:

I found this:

http://cul.detmich.com/girouxoped.html

I know the guy who wrote that article.

He is in my parish. Two of his daughters were on the Tanzania mission I went on and his son is in my Boy Scout troop. His brother is a Fransiscan of the Renewal.

Good Guy!!

Women "Priests" at Mass Today

Who is online