Parker -- You and Me and Sola Scriptura

Highlander · **Posted:** Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:13 am

pax wrote:

Has Parker gone bye-bye?

One can only hope.

ExsurgeDomine · **Posted:** Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:16 pm

pax wrote:

Has Parker gone bye-bye?

I'm sure... like so many before.

Obi-Wan Kenobi · **Posted:** Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:45 pm

E's not gone. E's resting. E's all tired and shagged out after eating turkey all day.

pax · **Posted:** Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:01 pm

Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:

E's not gone. E's resting. E's all tired and shagged out after eating turkey all day.

No. E's gone. The questions were just too difficult for him to answer.

haparker321 · **Posted:** Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:28 pm

Quote:

You are not grasping this Parker.

I get it, I don't agree with you.

Quote:

Both of these statements are true:

Sacred Tradition is a necessary component of the Deposit of Faith.

Sacred Scripture is a necessary component of the Deposit of Faith.

Again, my argument against the Catholic notion of this is that you do not have any scriptural or historical evidences that defines tradition just as you have described.

Quote:

The Deposit of Faith is the entire teaching of the New Covenant delivered to the Apostles by the mouth of Our Lord Himself.

I am not disagreeing about what the deposit of faith, but what it entails does not seem to be defined by history or scripture.

Parker

haparker321 · **Posted:** Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:42 pm

If I am absent a while it could be for the following things:

(1) I am working at my job.
(2) I am blogging.
(3) I am working on my book.
(4) I am involved at Church.
(5) I am doing research.

Take your pick.

Parker

pax · **Posted:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:30 am

haparker321 wrote:

(5) I am doing research.

Are you researching the Deposit of Faith?

haparker321 · **Posted:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:53 pm

pax wrote:

haparker321 wrote:

(5) I am doing research.

Are you researching the Deposit of Faith?

It's not on the top of my list because I write books, make reviews, and working on a business plan. Nevertheless, as I have seen this with the other post you still have not answered the objective questions I asked.

Parker

pax · **Posted:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:04 pm

haparker321 wrote:

Quote:

You are not grasping this Parker.

I get it, I don't agree with you.

Quote:

Both of these statements are true:

Sacred Tradition is a necessary component of the Deposit of Faith.

Sacred Scripture is a necessary component of the Deposit of Faith.

Again, my argument against the Catholic notion of this is that you do not have any scriptural or historical evidences that defines tradition just as you have described.

Quote:

The Deposit of Faith is the entire teaching of the New Covenant delivered to the Apostles by the mouth of Our Lord Himself.

I am not disagreeing about what the deposit of faith, but what it entails does not seem to be defined by history or scripture.

Parker

What history are you reading? There were Christians between the years 95 and 1517.

haparker321 · **Posted:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:00 pm

pax wrote:

What history are you reading? There were Christians between the years 95 and 1517.

I want some concrete quotes that define tradition just as the Roman Catholic Church has defined it. So far, you have not cited a single source to back this claim up.

Parker

Signum Crucis · **Posted:** Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:47 pm

You aren't in a position to make demands seeing as how you have failed to answer questions yourself, as well as failing to document your own claims.

pax · **Posted:** Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:05 pm

haparker321 wrote:

pax wrote:

What history are you reading? There were Christians between the years 95 and 1517.

I want some concrete quotes that define tradition just as the Roman Catholic Church has defined it. So far, you have not cited a single source to back this claim up.

Parker

http://www.anastasis.org.uk/lit-james.htm

http://www.ocf.org/OrthodoxPage/liturgy/liturgy.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/50473174/Brie ... St-Ambrose

Three liturgies from the ancient Church, celebrated by Christians all over the world.

Note how there is a priest, and how there is a sacrifice, and how that sacrifice is Christ Himself.

haparker321 · **Posted:** Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:06 am

pax wrote:

Note how there is a priest, and how there is a sacrifice, and how that sacrifice is Christ Himself.

I'm talking about Early Church Fathers, not a liturgical documents. Specifically, I'm talking about commentaries, catechisms, church documents. Ante-Nicean councils, preferably.

Parker

pax · **Posted:** Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:13 am

haparker321 wrote:

pax wrote:

Note how there is a priest, and how there is a sacrifice, and how that sacrifice is Christ Himself.

I'm talking about Early Church Fathers, not a liturgical documents. Specifically, I'm talking about commentaries, catechisms, church documents. Ante-Nicean councils, preferably.

Parker

So, having been shown that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass existed from the most ancient times, you now switch oars and ask for a different stream.

haparker321 · **Posted:** Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:45 pm

pax wrote:

haparker321 wrote:

pax wrote:

Note how there is a priest, and how there is a sacrifice, and how that sacrifice is Christ Himself.

I'm talking about Early Church Fathers, not a liturgical documents. Specifically, I'm talking about commentaries, catechisms, church documents. Ante-Nicean councils, preferably.

Parker

Pax,

Don't play games here; we both know what I'm looking for. You should not be using the 'Sacrifice of the Mass' as proof for traditional definitions.

Parker

pax · **Posted:** Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:47 pm

haparker321 wrote:

You should not be using the 'Sacrifice of the Mass' as proof for traditional definitions.

Au contraire, mon frere! The Last Supper is plastered all over the Scriptures. How did the early Church understand this Last Supper? As a Sacrifice. Not a meal. A Sacrifice.

Parker -- You and Me and Sola Scriptura

Who is online